Tham khảo Chiến_tranh_Ấn_Độ-Pakistan_1965

  1. ↑ David R. Higgins 2016.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFDavid_R._Higgins2016 (trợ giúp)
  2. ↑ Rachna Bisht 2015.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFRachna_Bisht2015 (trợ giúp)
  3. ↑ Lyon, Peter (2008). Conflict between India and Pakistan: an encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. tr. 82. ISBN 978-1-57607-712-2. Truy cập ngày 30 tháng 10 năm 2011.
  4. ↑ “Indo-Pakistani War of 1965”. Global Security.
  5. ↑ Dijink, Gertjan (2002). National Identity and Geopolitical Visions: Maps of Pride and Pain. Routledge. ISBN 9781134771295. The superior Indian forces, however, won a decisive victory and the army could have even marched on into Pakistani territory had external pressure not forced both combatants to cease their war efforts.
  6. 1 2 McGarr, Paul. The Cold War in South Asia: Britain, the United States and the Indian Subcontinent, 1945–1965. Cambridge University Press, 2013. tr. 331. ISBN 978-1-139-02207-1. "Satisfied that it had secured a strategic and psychological victory over Pakistan by frustrating its attempt to seize Kashmir by force, when the UN resolution was passed, India accepted its terms ... with Pakistan's stocks of ammunition and other essential supplies all but exhausted, and with the military balance tipping steadily in India's favour."
  7. ↑ Pakistan:: The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965. Library of Congress Country Studies, United States of America. tháng 4 năm 1994. Truy cập ngày 2 tháng 10 năm 2010. "Losses were relatively heavy—on the Pakistani side, twenty aircraft, 200 tanks, and 3,800 troops. Pakistan's army had been able to withstand Indian pressure, but a continuation of the fighting would only have led to further losses and ultimate defeat for Pakistan."
  8. ↑ Hagerty, Devin (2005). South Asia in world politics. Rowman & Littlefield. tr. 26. ISBN 978-0-7425-2587-0. Quote: The invading Indian forces outfought their Pakistani counterparts and halted their attack on the outskirts of Lahore, Pakistan's second-largest city. By the time the United Nations intervened on 22 September, Pakistan had suffered a clear defeat.
  9. ↑ Wolpert, Stanley (2005). India (ấn bản 3). Berkeley: University of California Press. tr. 235. ISBN 978-0-520-24696-6. Quote: India, however, was in a position to inflict grave damage to, if not capture, Pakistan's capital of the Punjab when the cease-fire was called, and controlled Kashmir's strategic Uri-Poonch bulge, much to Ayub's chagrin.
  10. ↑ Kux, Dennis (1992). India and the United States: Estranged democracies, 1941–1991. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press. tr. 238. ISBN 978-0-7881-0279-0. Quote: India had the better of the war.
  11. ↑ “Asia: Silent Guns, Wary Combatants”. Time. ngày 1 tháng 10 năm 1965. Truy cập ngày 30 tháng 8 năm 2013. Quote: India, by contrast, is still the big gainer in the war. Alternate link content.time.com
  12. ↑ Kux, Dennis (2006). India-Pakistan Negotiations: Is Past Still Prologue?. US Institute of Peace Press. tr. 30. ISBN 9781929223879. The conflict was short, but nasty. After seventeen days, both sides accepted a UN Security Council call for a cease-fire. Although the two militaries fought to a standoff, India won by not losing.
  13. 1 2 Small, Andrew (2015). The China-Pakistan Axis: Asia's New Geopolitics. Oxford University Press. tr. 17. ISBN 978-0-19-021075-5. "... the war itself was a disaster for Pakistan, from the first failed attempts by Pakistani troops to precipitate an insurgency in Kashmir to the appearance of Indian artillery within range of Lahore International Airport."
  14. ↑ Conley, Jerome (2001). Indo-Russian military and nuclear cooperation: lessons and options for U.S. policy in South Asia. Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0-7391-0217-6.
  15. ↑ Profile of Pakistan – U.S. Department of State, Failure of U.S.'s Pakistan Policy – Interview with Steve Coll
  16. ↑ Speech of Bill McCollum Lưu trữ 2016-03-04 tại Wayback Machine in United States House of Representatives ngày 12 tháng 9 năm 1994
  17. ↑ South Asia in World Politics By Devin T. Hagerty, 2005 Rowman & Littlefield, ISBN 0-7425-2587-2, p. 26
  18. ↑ McGarr, Paul. The Cold War in South Asia: Britain, the United States and the Indian Subcontinent, 1945–1965. Cambridge University Press, 2013. tr. 315. ISBN 978-1-139-02207-1. "... after some initial success, the momentum behind Pakistan's thrust into Kashmir slowed, and the state's inhabitants rejected exhortations from the Pakistani insurgents to join them in taking up arms against their Indian "oppressors." Pakistan's inability to muster support from the local Kashmiri population proved a disaster, both militarily and politically."
  19. ↑ Small, Andrew (2015). The China-Pakistan Axis: Asia's New Geopolitics. Oxford University Press. tr. 17–19. ISBN 978-0-19-021075-5. "Mao had decided that China would intervene under two conditions—that India attacked East Pakistan, and that Pakistan requested Chinese intervention. In the end, neither of them [were] obtained."
  20. ↑ McGarr, Paul. The Cold War in South Asia: Britain, the United States and the Indian Subcontinent, 1945–1965. Cambridge University Press, 2013. tr. 325–327. ISBN 978-1-139-02207-1.
  21. ↑ Riedel, Bruce (2013). Avoiding Armageddon: America, India, and Pakistan to the Brink and Back. Brookings Institution Press. tr. 66–68. ISBN 978-0-8157-2408-7.